So, I tested it here before going to the range using sophisticated calibrated instruments to insure I would have accurate readings at the range:
A rubber band clocked in at 83 feet per second! Good to go!
Wednesday, May 11, 2011
De sighing....
So the "Brown Truck of Happiness" brought this today. A new chronograph from a different manufacturer and a 100 bucks cheaper to boot!
So, I tested it here before going to the range using sophisticated calibrated instruments to insure I would have accurate readings at the range:
A rubber band clocked in at 83 feet per second! Good to go!
So, I tested it here before going to the range using sophisticated calibrated instruments to insure I would have accurate readings at the range:
A rubber band clocked in at 83 feet per second! Good to go!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The slower and thicker rubber band would be better. People can get hit by those light rubber bands and just about shrug them off.
ReplyDeleteI carry nothing lighter than a 1/4" band. Has a '4' in it...
North, LOL! That is too funny! So are we into caliber wars on rubber bands? HA!
ReplyDeleteTest results tomorrow? Where'd you get this one?
ReplyDelete@ Scott- As usual my good friend Larry at Midway USA!
ReplyDelete@North~LOL
ReplyDelete@Kelly~ What was your target with that rubber band?
Keads, you must be testing for the mach 10 reload that doesn't 'splode your gun.
ReplyDeleteIf you are still alive, please respond to this comment.
hello? anyone?
Remember... THROUGH not at :-)
ReplyDeletekx59- Still here, just a bit busy!
ReplyDeleteNFO- Oh, perhaps that is the problem! =)
My Dad has one like that. He replaced the skyscreens a while back (no, he didn't shoot the old ones - they had another that was less prone to catch the wind).
ReplyDeleteHe says it works great.
@ The Donald, Thanks for the info and welcome!
ReplyDelete